April 20, 2024

Australian Corporate Blogging Takes Uncertain Steps

Posted by: of Thinking Home Business on 03/2/06

No doubt I wasn’t the only Australian blogger to hope that the ‘To Blog or Not to Blog’ segment on the Nine Network’s Business Sunday TV program, February 26, would have something worthwhile to show and say about the state of the Australian business blogosphere. Nothing too profound, mind you. Screened at the decidedly non-peak hour of 8.30am every Sunday in the ratings period, the program is not usually very mentally taxing. In the event, it was quite interesting for me, although I can’t help wondering what corporate executives would have made of it, in terms of the usefulness and desirability of their companies establishing a blog.

There is a link here to the transcript of the program. That is regrettably not a blog permalink, so it will presumably only stay on the web for a limited time. A handy resource for anyone reading the transcript is the post with links to the sites of the people interviewed: this was put up by one of the main interviewees, dedicated Microsoft Aussie Blogger Frank Arrigo, and is a blog permalink.

As the transcript shows, Frank and others, including Trevor Cook, had some very useful comments to make. But what I found a real downer was that the last two people interviewed, before a final comment from Frank, were Australian lawyers from global partnerships, emphasizing the downside risks of corporate blogging and explaining why their firms weren’t blogging. No serious discussion of risk management, just a ‘flick to the too-hard basket’ approach.

Knowing from experience how what is actually said in interviews from such programs can become scarcely recognizable when the program is aired, it may well be that the lawyers – both very knowledgeable in the IT space – actually contributed a more nuanced commentary. Snip! Sorry (not really) about that!

Actually, the final comment from Frank was pretty neat, pointing out that corporates actually can’t afford not to be in the blogging space. But my own feeling is that half-awake corporate execs chomping on their breakfast toast at 8.55am or so would have been inclined to be more influenced by the do-nothing-new, cautious words we heard from the attorneys.

Of course, one Sunday morning television program cannot tell the whole story. I’m tremendously keen for business blogging to kick off in Australia and I’m optimistic about that happening soon. I’ve been encouraged in this by indications such as the invitations I have to present at various events this month and next and then later in the year.

It’s quite possible however that not a lot has changed since Trevor Cook’s excellent State of Australian Blogging  post five months ago:

Overall, blogging in Australia lags behind the US and probably behind some Asian and European countries. Why? One reason is that we usually do. Australia’s population is made up of a few thousand people who have a genuine global view and who are very much at the cutting edge but the bulk of the population are followers of international trends (we’ll try something when it becomes the rage overseas).

Trevor concluded that post with an expression of optimism about how things would be this year. So I find it sobering that a conference on blogs, wikis and rss, at which both Trevor and I are scheduled to speak, has now been re-timetabled from the end of this month to a date six months hence.

Are we there yet? I don’t think so.

3 comments for Australian Corporate Blogging Takes Uncertain Steps

  1. My complete agreement on the Lawyer – wonder how long his firm has had a web site – probably just after they survived Y2k – you can’t rush these things.

    Overall the article seemed, as you suggested, less than taxing, and missed a great opportunity. I and a few colleagues thought the journalist possibly didn’t get it.

    While it was sensible to mention Bob Lutz at GM putting content out, they failed to emphasise the fact that others can COMMENT on what he says – it’s two-way communication, folks! And on top of that, others, such as vitally interested GM dealers, can SUBSCRIBE to Bob’s content to get the real world view.

    That’s where the value lies.

    I guess the lawyer thinks it would be safer to stick your head in the sand, and wonder why your stock tanks.

    At the minimum at least a few business folk now know what the word blog refers to, so I guess it’s something.

    Comment by Tony Meurer — March 2, 2006 @ 11:44 pm


  2. Thanks for saying ‘the lawyer’ Tony. As Wayne Hurlbert indicates in a subsequent post on this blog, we should take responsibility for and correct our errors transparently. I mentioned two lawyers: re-examining the transcript it is pretty clear that one of the people I thought was a lawyer was from an accounting practice.

    Comment by Des Walsh — March 8, 2006 @ 2:59 am


  3. Hi Des, I have been an avid reader of your blog for some time and thought I would make my first post. I have eventually found the transcripts on your past comments from another source and have found them very interesting. Many “old school” type businesses and companies fail to recognise the importance of a well written blog not just for today but for tomorrow. With so many people riling on mobile phones these days for not only communication but information on Products and Services it is important to understand what this medium can do for any business. Food for thought..

    Comment by Pomotional Blog — April 28, 2010 @ 9:26 pm


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 

Syndicate:

RSS RSS Feed



Posts via e-mail

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Recent Posts:

Archives:

Buzz Cloud:

Recent Readers:

Tag Cloud:

Categories: