<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging and the Problem of the Echo Chamber</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/11/blogging-and-the-problem-of-the-echo-chamber/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/11/blogging-and-the-problem-of-the-echo-chamber</link>
	<description>News, commentary, tools and tips about business blogging and the world of corporate blogs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 13:09:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Searls</title>
		<link>http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/11/blogging-and-the-problem-of-the-echo-chamber#comment-71776</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Searls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/11/blogging-and-the-problem-of-the-echo-chamber.html#comment-71776</guid>
		<description>First, I don&#039;t get that much traffic. Never have. Check here:


http://doc.weblogs.com/discuss/


Shows 466 visits so far today. Not a small number, but far from what many *real* &quot;A-listers&quot; get.

Second, while echo chambers exist, that&#039;s not what drives the Google juice. It&#039;s saying quotable and interesting stuff, and doing it over a long period of time. That&#039;s the real SEO secret.

For whatever it&#039;s worth, I&#039;ve never tried to optimize search results for my blog. I just do what I do. If you look at my referers log...

http://doc.weblogs.com/stats/referers

... you&#039;ll see relatively little from any &quot;echo chamber&quot;. Instead you&#039;ll mostly find searches for topics that my blog has been associated with, one way or another, over the last seven years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I don&#8217;t get that much traffic. Never have. Check here:</p>
<p><a href="http://doc.weblogs.com/discuss/" rel="nofollow">http://doc.weblogs.com/discuss/</a></p>
<p>Shows 466 visits so far today. Not a small number, but far from what many *real* &#8220;A-listers&#8221; get.</p>
<p>Second, while echo chambers exist, that&#8217;s not what drives the Google juice. It&#8217;s saying quotable and interesting stuff, and doing it over a long period of time. That&#8217;s the real SEO secret.</p>
<p>For whatever it&#8217;s worth, I&#8217;ve never tried to optimize search results for my blog. I just do what I do. If you look at my referers log&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://doc.weblogs.com/stats/referers" rel="nofollow">http://doc.weblogs.com/stats/referers</a></p>
<p>&#8230; you&#8217;ll see relatively little from any &#8220;echo chamber&#8221;. Instead you&#8217;ll mostly find searches for topics that my blog has been associated with, one way or another, over the last seven years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search and Find &#187; Blogging and the Problem of the Echo Chamber</title>
		<link>http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/11/blogging-and-the-problem-of-the-echo-chamber#comment-71375</link>
		<dc:creator>Search and Find &#187; Blogging and the Problem of the Echo Chamber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 05:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/11/blogging-and-the-problem-of-the-echo-chamber.html#comment-71375</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by Jim Turner [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by Jim Turner [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

