<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yo Ho Ho and a Blogger with Rum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/06/yo-ho-ho-and-a-blogger-with-rum-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/06/yo-ho-ho-and-a-blogger-with-rum-2</link>
	<description>News, commentary, tools and tips about business blogging and the world of corporate blogs</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 06:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick E. Bruner</title>
		<link>http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/06/yo-ho-ho-and-a-blogger-with-rum-2#comment-15112</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick E. Bruner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 02:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/06/yo-ho-ho-and-a-blogger-with-rum-2.html#comment-15112</guid>
		<description>Although from reading our comments in juxtaposition, it would seem that Dave and I are disagreeing with one another. In fact, though, I completely agree with him. I spoke with this reporter for something like 40 minutes, so I said a lot of different things, but I did say something that she did not quote me on akin to Dave's point. I agree with him that I think many bloggers get bent out of shape about the purity of blogging. 

Like Dave said, it's a tool. What I object to is the deception of dumb faux corporate blogs that purport to be somethign they're not, like the authentic voice of a brand evangelist, when in actuality they're a staffer in marketing. That's a shill, and that's bad. But to blog in character, when it's obvious that it's a character, that's cool, so long as it's done well (which it rarely, though &lt;a href="http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2004/07/a_hrefhttpjaneb.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;sometimes&lt;/a&gt;, is).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although from reading our comments in juxtaposition, it would seem that Dave and I are disagreeing with one another. In fact, though, I completely agree with him. I spoke with this reporter for something like 40 minutes, so I said a lot of different things, but I did say something that she did not quote me on akin to Dave&#8217;s point. I agree with him that I think many bloggers get bent out of shape about the purity of blogging. </p>
<p>Like Dave said, it&#8217;s a tool. What I object to is the deception of dumb faux corporate blogs that purport to be somethign they&#8217;re not, like the authentic voice of a brand evangelist, when in actuality they&#8217;re a staffer in marketing. That&#8217;s a shill, and that&#8217;s bad. But to blog in character, when it&#8217;s obvious that it&#8217;s a character, that&#8217;s cool, so long as it&#8217;s done well (which it rarely, though <a href="http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2004/07/a_hrefhttpjaneb.html" rel="nofollow">sometimes</a>, is).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
