<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wal-Mart Blog PR Backfires</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires</link>
	<description>News, commentary, tools and tips about business blogging and the world of corporate blogs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 13:09:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogue marketing interactif de l&#8217;Association marketing de MontrÃ©al &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sources d&#8217;info sur les blogues en affaires</title>
		<link>http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires#comment-64059</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogue marketing interactif de l&#8217;Association marketing de MontrÃ©al &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sources d&#8217;info sur les blogues en affaires</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 15:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires.html#comment-64059</guid>
		<description>[...] Lisez entre autre ce billet (Why Business Don&#8217;t Blog in the UK) qui n&#8217;est pas sans rappeler ces m&#234;mes raisons qui font que bien des entreprises d&#8217;ici ne sont pas plus pr&#233;sentes dans la blogosph&#232;re que celles du Royaume-Uni. Ou cette s&#233;rie sur les d&#233;boires de Wal-Mart! (Wal-Mart blog PR backfires, Richard Edelman might get the blogosphere&#8230; but PRWeek does&#8217;nt, I don&#8217;t accept Edelman&#8217;s Appologies for the bogus Wal-Mart blog, Will the Edelman &#8212; Wal-Mart saga ever end? Two more flogs outed, Edelman responds with a plan. Will it be enough?. (ouf!) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lisez entre autre ce billet (Why Business Don&#8217;t Blog in the UK) qui n&#8217;est pas sans rappeler ces m&#234;mes raisons qui font que bien des entreprises d&#8217;ici ne sont pas plus pr&#233;sentes dans la blogosph&#232;re que celles du Royaume-Uni. Ou cette s&#233;rie sur les d&#233;boires de Wal-Mart! (Wal-Mart blog PR backfires, Richard Edelman might get the blogosphere&#8230; but PRWeek does&#8217;nt, I don&#8217;t accept Edelman&#8217;s Appologies for the bogus Wal-Mart blog, Will the Edelman &#8212; Wal-Mart saga ever end? Two more flogs outed, Edelman responds with a plan. Will it be enough?. (ouf!) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CorpBlawg &#187; A first attempt at a categorization (I)</title>
		<link>http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires#comment-30950</link>
		<dc:creator>CorpBlawg &#187; A first attempt at a categorization (I)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 11:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires.html#comment-30950</guid>
		<description>[...] The important exclusion here is of those who have made blogging a business for themselves, be it through consulting, blog hosting or as a personal business model. It is helpful to make this distinction for several reasons. Firstly, consulting and PR-related blogs have completely different stakes in blogging than do companies from other industries. They are concerned almost exclusively with promoting the practice of blogging (after all, that&#8217;s their business model) and with commenting on the performances of the &#8216;real&#8217; actors and how blogging helps (or hurts) their business. Secondly, professional bloggers - usually journalists, academics, activists, experts in a professional context such as business or technology etc - have an interest primarily in keeping their readers informed and entertained. As there is no aspect of business outside of blogging that immediatly concerns them, their stakes are also different. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The important exclusion here is of those who have made blogging a business for themselves, be it through consulting, blog hosting or as a personal business model. It is helpful to make this distinction for several reasons. Firstly, consulting and PR-related blogs have completely different stakes in blogging than do companies from other industries. They are concerned almost exclusively with promoting the practice of blogging (after all, that&#8217;s their business model) and with commenting on the performances of the &#8216;real&#8217; actors and how blogging helps (or hurts) their business. Secondly, professional bloggers &#8211; usually journalists, academics, activists, experts in a professional context such as business or technology etc &#8211; have an interest primarily in keeping their readers informed and entertained. As there is no aspect of business outside of blogging that immediatly concerns them, their stakes are also different. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Executive Summary</title>
		<link>http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires#comment-7390</link>
		<dc:creator>Executive Summary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 13:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires.html#comment-7390</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;How Not to Distribute a Press Release...&lt;/strong&gt;

Here&#039;s how you release a press release: you write it, you submit it to a......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>How Not to Distribute a Press Release&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how you release a press release: you write it, you submit it to a&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Not to Distribute a Press Release : Business Blog Consulting</title>
		<link>http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires#comment-7389</link>
		<dc:creator>How Not to Distribute a Press Release : Business Blog Consulting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 13:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires.html#comment-7389</guid>
		<description>[...] Here&#8217;s what you don&#8217;t do. You don&#8217;t email bloggers with the press release itself, because bloggers by and large don&#8217;t &#8220;rewrite&#8221; digested press releases and pretend that&#8217;s their own news, the way trade magazines do (unless, of course, they are the in the pocket of Wal-mart). Bloggers want to link to news, not rewrite it. That means, if you&#8217;re going to call their attention to a press release, have it posted to your web site already, not two days after it goes out on the wire service. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here&#8217;s what you don&#8217;t do. You don&#8217;t email bloggers with the press release itself, because bloggers by and large don&#8217;t &#8220;rewrite&#8221; digested press releases and pretend that&#8217;s their own news, the way trade magazines do (unless, of course, they are the in the pocket of Wal-mart). Bloggers want to link to news, not rewrite it. That means, if you&#8217;re going to call their attention to a press release, have it posted to your web site already, not two days after it goes out on the wire service. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Beller</title>
		<link>http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires#comment-4163</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Beller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 01:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires.html#comment-4163</guid>
		<description>As a blogger quoted in the Times story, I&#039;ll answer one of Debbie Weil&#039;s questions:

&quot;are some citizen journalists - aka bloggers -unaware of journalistic conventions like quoting, attributing sources, checking facts, etc.? Seems likely to me. (Although I donâ€™t know enough about this particular case to make that judgment.)&quot;

Most bloggers that I know are fact checking, and attributing either directly or through a link where they get their info. If you see a &quot;h/t&quot; in a blog article, it&#039;s a &quot;hat tip&quot; to the person who sent them the info.
Most, but not all are pretty good with their quoting, also. 

The flip side of her question is does the mainstream media always disclose when an article was started by a tip from PRNewswire or a drink with a PR rep? No, they don&#039;t, at least no according to the reports I&#039;ve been talking to the last few weeks, including Michael Barbaro at the Times for the article.

One of the big gripes on this whole issue is that there seems to be a double standard applied in Mr. Barbaro&#039;s article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a blogger quoted in the Times story, I&#8217;ll answer one of Debbie Weil&#8217;s questions:</p>
<p>&#8220;are some citizen journalists &#8211; aka bloggers -unaware of journalistic conventions like quoting, attributing sources, checking facts, etc.? Seems likely to me. (Although I donâ€™t know enough about this particular case to make that judgment.)&#8221;</p>
<p>Most bloggers that I know are fact checking, and attributing either directly or through a link where they get their info. If you see a &#8220;h/t&#8221; in a blog article, it&#8217;s a &#8220;hat tip&#8221; to the person who sent them the info.<br />
Most, but not all are pretty good with their quoting, also. </p>
<p>The flip side of her question is does the mainstream media always disclose when an article was started by a tip from PRNewswire or a drink with a PR rep? No, they don&#8217;t, at least no according to the reports I&#8217;ve been talking to the last few weeks, including Michael Barbaro at the Times for the article.</p>
<p>One of the big gripes on this whole issue is that there seems to be a double standard applied in Mr. Barbaro&#8217;s article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Buzz from WOM and CGM : Business Blog Consulting</title>
		<link>http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires#comment-4142</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Buzz from WOM and CGM : Business Blog Consulting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 02:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires.html#comment-4142</guid>
		<description>[...] With some of the recent attention towards blog relations, there&#8217;s no question that buzz marketing through blogs and similar consumer generated media is on the rise. Blogs are many things including marketing tools for business and also voices to be heard - consumer voices that provide insight into a marketplace. Availability and ease of communications along with creative tools make consumer generated media (CGM) a force to be reckoned with. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With some of the recent attention towards blog relations, there&#8217;s no question that buzz marketing through blogs and similar consumer generated media is on the rise. Blogs are many things including marketing tools for business and also voices to be heard &#8211; consumer voices that provide insight into a marketplace. Availability and ease of communications along with creative tools make consumer generated media (CGM) a force to be reckoned with. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Odden</title>
		<link>http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires#comment-4140</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Odden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 00:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires.html#comment-4140</guid>
		<description>So how many bloggers are susceptible to being wooed in their opinions by large organizations like Edelman and Wal-Mart on a topic like this? 

Perhaps the post title would have better matched the content as, &quot;Did Wal-Mart Blog PR Backfire?&quot; but I doubt it would have received as much attention from both pros and cons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how many bloggers are susceptible to being wooed in their opinions by large organizations like Edelman and Wal-Mart on a topic like this? </p>
<p>Perhaps the post title would have better matched the content as, &#8220;Did Wal-Mart Blog PR Backfire?&#8221; but I doubt it would have received as much attention from both pros and cons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie Weil</title>
		<link>http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires#comment-4138</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie Weil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 00:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires.html#comment-4138</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a few more cents of my thinking on blogger relations. Click my name.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a few more cents of my thinking on blogger relations. Click my name.  <img src='http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires#comment-4137</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 22:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires.html#comment-4137</guid>
		<description>Edelman does it right.  Richard Edelman, Mike Krempasky, Steve Rubel, Phil Gomes ... no company has a better bench.  The NY Times piece was a non-story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edelman does it right.  Richard Edelman, Mike Krempasky, Steve Rubel, Phil Gomes &#8230; no company has a better bench.  The NY Times piece was a non-story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie Weil</title>
		<link>http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires#comment-4136</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie Weil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 22:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires.html#comment-4136</guid>
		<description>The NYTimes article brings up lots of issues to ponder:

- is the NYTimes reporter biased in favor of anti Wal-Mart readers? Seems unlikely to me but who knows.

- are some citizen journalists - aka bloggers - unaware of journalistic conventions like quoting, attributing sources, checking facts, etc.? Seems likely to me. (Although I don&#039;t know enough about this particular case to make that judgment.)

- should Edelman be engaging in this kind of blogger relations? Hmmm... why not. The bloggers who are being approached need to be super savvy about the information they&#039;re being fed. In other words, they need to act more like mainstream journalists and ask lost more questions themselves.

My .02 cents for the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NYTimes article brings up lots of issues to ponder:</p>
<p>- is the NYTimes reporter biased in favor of anti Wal-Mart readers? Seems unlikely to me but who knows.</p>
<p>- are some citizen journalists &#8211; aka bloggers &#8211; unaware of journalistic conventions like quoting, attributing sources, checking facts, etc.? Seems likely to me. (Although I don&#8217;t know enough about this particular case to make that judgment.)</p>
<p>- should Edelman be engaging in this kind of blogger relations? Hmmm&#8230; why not. The bloggers who are being approached need to be super savvy about the information they&#8217;re being fed. In other words, they need to act more like mainstream journalists and ask lost more questions themselves.</p>
<p>My .02 cents for the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Odden</title>
		<link>http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires#comment-4133</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Odden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 20:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires.html#comment-4133</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the comments. It gives additional perspective on the situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the comments. It gives additional perspective on the situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires#comment-4132</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 20:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires.html#comment-4132</guid>
		<description>Same here.  We were not paid, and we were not told what to write, only given links to news articles.  Quite frankly, we probably would have come across these articles anyway.

Barbaro&#039;s claim of &quot;cutting and pasting&quot; is because I used a line from an email tip (not from Wal-Mart or the PR firm, btw) I received and neglected to put it in my quote box.  The fact that he only mentions that one line attests to the fact that I didn&#039;t write &quot;word for word&quot; what was sent to me.

Barbaro&#039;s reporting on this is....let&#039;s just say, unique.  He has his own version of what really happened, and he&#039;s more than happy to share that version with anti Wal-Mart readers everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same here.  We were not paid, and we were not told what to write, only given links to news articles.  Quite frankly, we probably would have come across these articles anyway.</p>
<p>Barbaro&#8217;s claim of &#8220;cutting and pasting&#8221; is because I used a line from an email tip (not from Wal-Mart or the PR firm, btw) I received and neglected to put it in my quote box.  The fact that he only mentions that one line attests to the fact that I didn&#8217;t write &#8220;word for word&#8221; what was sent to me.</p>
<p>Barbaro&#8217;s reporting on this is&#8230;.let&#8217;s just say, unique.  He has his own version of what really happened, and he&#8217;s more than happy to share that version with anti Wal-Mart readers everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Admin</title>
		<link>http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires#comment-4131</link>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessblogconsulting.com/2006/03/wal-mart-blog-pr-backfires.html#comment-4131</guid>
		<description>I was one of the persons who ran into this PR firm. The people that received information from a PR firm were not paid nor did they receive anything other that some links to some stories and at most a sentence or two.  Though I received many correspondences, I only created a post about one of them.  I do however have many posts about free markets, capitalism, and the such dealing with Wal-mart.

What is missing from this story is the corporate campaign by the unions against Walmart. If they can&#039;t get the Wal-mart employees to unionize they are trying another old strategy of propaganda, regulation accusations, along with the help of the pro-union media (which the NY Times author is a member of). What people fail to realize, is that this doesn&#039;t hurt Wal-mart. It hurts the hundreds of thousand of employees trying to earn money for their families.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was one of the persons who ran into this PR firm. The people that received information from a PR firm were not paid nor did they receive anything other that some links to some stories and at most a sentence or two.  Though I received many correspondences, I only created a post about one of them.  I do however have many posts about free markets, capitalism, and the such dealing with Wal-mart.</p>
<p>What is missing from this story is the corporate campaign by the unions against Walmart. If they can&#8217;t get the Wal-mart employees to unionize they are trying another old strategy of propaganda, regulation accusations, along with the help of the pro-union media (which the NY Times author is a member of). What people fail to realize, is that this doesn&#8217;t hurt Wal-mart. It hurts the hundreds of thousand of employees trying to earn money for their families.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

